> > FWIW, portindexdb will generate INDEX-5.db just fine on 5-current. It > doesn't have the problem with ruby bus erroring like portsdb -u does. > > Kent
This also works for me on 5.2.1-p9. Am I missing something in asking why couldn't "portsdb -u" be replaced by portindex? Obviously this couldn't happen now with the code-freeze for 5.3, but for 5.4? Steve _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"