On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 05:26:54PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
: Jonathon McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > I know this is not BSD specific, but I just wanted to get your opinions. I
: > was wondering what might affect my decision which to use, other than
: > licensing and (IIRC) the fancier font handling of Xemacs.
: Both are licensed under the GPL, and the font handling is not
: significantly different these days. The "eXtended" features
: that give Xemacs its name are only of interest to people who
: program emacs heavily in LISP.
: In other words, it's unlikely to matter to you. Try them both
: and pick whichever you like.
No big difference in performance (the LISP engine) or memory usage? I'm
running on an older, smaller laptop. Xemacs has been fine, but since I am
starting over, I thought I'd check out my options.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"