On Tuesday 12 October 2004 21:53, David Jenkins wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:26:55 +0300, Toomas Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > "Lars H. Beuse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i want some apache NameVirtualHost behind a Paketfilter based on ipf, > > > placed in two subnets. This router has two Cards one in the private > > > net, one in the public. So far i just forward port 80 and 443 into my > > > private net 192.168.2.0, but every request ends up on apaches > > > rootlevel, NameVirtualHost directive is useless. So, how to forward > > > http(s):// requests through the Paketfilter matching the right > > > VirtualHost? Maybe i've thought in a wrong direction, so far. Just some > > > little hints should be enough. > > > > I can't be 100% sure because I haven't done this kind of thing myself, > > but I don't see why port forwarding should interfere with Apache's > > name-based virtual hosting. After all, they operate on different layers > > of the OSI model: port forwarding is purely TCP business while > > VirtualHosts are HTTP. [...] Jepp, that's why i'am a bit confused. Cause unfiltered ApacheVirtualHosts i run a few. So i think i solved that issue: That was my Virtual Host Container before it works:
NameVirtualHost www.domain.org:80 <VirtualHost www.domain.org:80> blablabla </Virtual> The Container that works: NameVirtualHost 192.168.2.5:80 <VirtualHost 192.168.2.5:80> blablabla </Virtual> Thanx, for youre reply. But why is that? I'm not really shure. So i will go deeper in that. Ciao Lars _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
