On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:11:26AM +0900, Choy Kho Yee wrote: > On 2004/10/18, at 2:11, Radek Kozlowski wrote: > > >On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 12:58:15PM -0400, Mark Frank wrote: > >>Yesterday I did a fresh install off of a 5.3beta5 CD and them before > >>going to bed last night I cvsup'ed with a "*default release=cvs > >>tag=RELENG_5" and a buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel cycle. > >> > >>I had expected to end up with 5.3beta7 but to my surprise I ended up > >>with > >>a "uname -a" of: > >> > >>FreeBSD guinness.local.mark-and-erika.com 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD > >>5.3-STABLE #0: > >>Sun Oct 17 02:47:12 EDT 2004 > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > >>i386 > >> > >>Do I really have 5.3-STABLE or am I missing something? I can't find > >>any announcement on the freebsd.org web site. Is this really > >>5.3-STABLE? I assumed there would be a 5.3-RC1...or is this it? > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033698.html > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033702.html > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033703.html > > > >-Radek > > Sorry but I am not very sure about this after reading the above CVS > commit messages. > Does that mean if we don't want to follow the -STABLE branch but would > like to stick > to 5.3-RELEASE, this is the time to change the tag to "RELENG_5_3" or > else we would > end up with -STABLE?
Yes. Kris
pgpU1EOTEnROb.pgp
Description: PGP signature