On 2004-10-26 14:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >In a message dated 10/26/04 10:07:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Nonsense, if you ask me. For many reasons: >> >> a. Windows doesn't work nicely even for small networks most of the time. >> It's not the size of the network that matters. It's the nature of the >> network. Homogeneous, Windows-only networks will usually work somehow; >> not optimally, mind you, but they can be coerced into working. >> Heterogeneous networking environments, with many different types and >> versions of operating systems, are not so easy to use from Windows. > > the same can be said of Cisco based networks. Everything works "better" > with products of the same make. Even NFS between different un*x boxes has > issues.
The fact that Cisco does something wrong doesn't somehow make it right for Windows. It's not a good excuse either. > Integration is what separates the men from the boys, so don't complain. > If it were "easy" most of us would be doing something else. I don't see you supporting UNIX because "it's harder to use, so it must be what 'real men' use". Probably because this sort of argument is pointless. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
