On 2004-11-28 04:48, Jonathon McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 03:31:35AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > : AFAIK, rule 00300 will never be hit by packets going out tun0 as long as > : you also have rule 00200 in there. > > Hmmm.... here's a run after having the laptop running for a bit. I don't > see why 200 doesn't cover the case either. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ipfw show > 00100 0 0 check-state > 00200 6709 1277079 allow ip from me to any keep-state out xmit tun0 > 00300 2093 645797 allow ip from any to any keep-state out xmit tun0
Oops! That doesn't look good, unless I'm missing something about the way 'me' works. It's probably a good idea to send what you have so far to the freebsd-ipfw people. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
