In the last episode (Nov 29), Vulpes Velox said:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:03:33 -0600 Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the last episode (Nov 28), Kevin Smith said:
> > > The /usr/ports can take up a lot of space and I'm wondering if
> > > there are limitations to having ports live in a another files
> > > system with a symbolic link from /usr/ports to a ports directory
> > > in another file system.
> >
> > No limitations at all. You can even symlink it over NFS to another
> > machine if you want (set WRKDIRPREFIX to a local path in
> > /etc/make.conf though, to speed up builds).
>
> If one is going to be using NFS for it, I don't see any reason not to
> just mount it right to /usr/ports instead of messing with symbolic
> linking.
The symlink lets amd do the work of mounting the filesystem, that's all.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
