On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:18:39AM +0000, jason henson wrote: > On 12/25/04 20:58:12, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 08:17:00PM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > >> When I ran 'buildkernel' as well as 'buildworld', I used > >> the 'CPUTYPE?=i686' directive in the 'make.conf' file. I was > >wondering if > >> it is correct to leave it in the 'make.conf' file now that I am > >finished > >> building a new kernel and updating the system. Would I be better > >off > >if I > >> just removed it, or changed it to 'CPUTYPE=i686'. I assumed that > >the > >'?' > >> was just for the 'buildworld' procedure. > > > >Setting it with ?= was a bug that was recently fixed. You can cvsup > >and continue to set it with =. > > > >Kris > > > What happened to march= in make.conf. Has it been depreciated?
Not as such, but CPUTYPE does it better (because it also enables cpu-specific asm code in some places, and you don't have to remember gcc syntax). Kris
pgpaMMCNNeeOh.pgp
Description: PGP signature