Olivier Nicole wrote:
All servers run RAID5 .. only one other is using vinum, the other 3 are
using hardware RAID controllers ...
Come on, of course a software solution will be slower than an hardware
solution. What would you expect? :))
(Given it is same disk type/speed/controler...)
Usually this is the case, but it's also very dependent on the hardware
raid controller. There are situations where a software raid (vinum in
this case) can outperform some hardward controlers under specific
circumstances, i.e. sequential reads w/very large stripe size. An
example is an image server where the average image might be 3MB. A
stripe size of 434kB would cause ~7 transfers of data. A case for a
larger stripe size of 5MB would greatly improve performance. There
would be an 2MB diff in the avg file size that doesn't have any useable
data. Only 1 transfer of data would occur. Vinum optimizes the data
transfered to the exact 3MB of the file, whereas some hardware controls
would transfer the whole 5MB stripe, adding some bandwidth latency and
transfer time. Again, it's a matter of specific cases, and assuming
'performance' based on differing conduits for data transfer can just
skirt the real issue, if there is any.
Cheers,
-.mag
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
