Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 18 Feb Peter Kieser wrote:
vr0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::211:d8ff:fe3d:564a%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
ether 00:11:d8:3d:56:4a
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
map dc0 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0/32
map dc1 192.168.2.0/24 -> 0/32
I only seee 192.168.1.1 defined. Is this a typo or is there inof
missing?
The map with the CIDR prefix only specifies what IP addresses the NAT
will masquerade for, still doesn't explain why 192.168.1.0/24 masquarde
fails to work. You can specify the subnet mask for 192.168.1.1 as
255.255.254.0 to cover both those blocks, which is a 192.168.0.0/23.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
