On Sunday 27 February 2005 04:01 am, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > John writes: > > I suppose I'm nit-picking here, but you would cron it rather than running > > it by hand. > > It's mostly the space that I prefer not to part with. > > > How much space have you got to play with? > > About 2 GB total remaining on /usr. Just installing X stuff gobbled up > a few hundred megabytes, it seems. > > > If space is tight, running make > > distclean after make install helps, as does periodically deleting the > > contents of /usr/ports/distfiles > > Does pkg_add do this? > > > [0] if you mean, by "pull the index from an ftp site" cd /usr/ports && > > make index > > I meant running /stand/sysinstall and selecting an FTP site as the > "installation media" for the software. It always downloads some sort of > index when I do that, which I assume is an up-to-date list of all the > ports available.
Being somewhat of a newvie, I should probably not be saying anything, but that's the assumption that nailed you. If I understand the situation correctly, what you got was information on *packages* available when the OS version was released, a subset of available ports. And this time around, that list was not in a totally self-consistent state. My own experiences have given me a definite bias toward using the ports system to compile stuff to be added to my system rather than going with the binary packages. I get the impression that many port maintainers who are fairly careful about keeping their port versions workable and patched only give a relative lick and promise to their packages. -LenZ- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
