Mark Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mar 1, 2005, at 12:53 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > >>>> Looking on the net, I found the following suggestion, which does > >>>> cure > >>>> the errors: > >>>> > >>>> /sbin/route add -net 192.168.1.254 -netmask 255.255.255.0 > >>>> -interface 1 > >>>> > >>>> My question is, is that the proper way to deal with this? > >>> > >>> It's not bad. I would use -host instead of -net and -netmask, and it > >>> will fail if the DHCP server ever changes its address, but what you > >>> are doing is is working and fairly likely to stay that way. > >> > >> How would you phrase the command? I just tried -host and couldn't get > >> it to work. > > > > e.g., > > route add -host 172.10.212.2 -interface bge0 > > I tried that syntax and I get errors like this: > > Mar 1 13:12:37 lilbuddy /kernel: arp: 00:0d:72:d7:d9:a1 attempts to > modify permanent entry for 192.168.1.254 on ep1 > > If I use the -net -netmask syntax I don't get the errors.
"permanent entry"? Did you put in a static ARP? At any rate, I'd try a /32 mask instead of /24. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
