On 01/09/2012 02:21, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:40:30AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2012 00:12, schrieb Doug Barton:
>>> Attached is a patch that does what I suggested a long time ago, removes
>>> set_rcvar() entirely and assigns each rcvar statically. I'll commit this
>>> in a few days if no one objects. (Note, it can't be committed yet
>>> because the scripts in ports that call set_rcvar() have to be modified
>>> first.)
>> [...]
>>> Index: rc.d/nscd
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- rc.d/nscd (revision 229825)
>>> +++ rc.d/nscd (working copy)
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>> . /etc/rc.subr
>>>
>>> name="nscd"
>>> -rcvar=`set_rcvar`
>>> +rcvar="nscd_enable"
>>
>> Why not generally use
>>
>> rcvar="${name}_enable"
>>
>> instead of (e.g.)
>>
>> rcvar="nscd_enable"
>>
>> in all scripts *in your patch set*, for which the outcome is the same?
>
> I fully agree. There is one less thing to change after reusing a script.
> I can't see how this might be a bad idea, really.
See my previous response.
If you still need help with that "search and replace" thing I can walk
you through it in vi. If you're an emacs user, you're on your own
though, sorry. :)
Doug
--
You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
