On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:37:57 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:43:06PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
I think in most cases if devfs mount fails you will likely not end
up
with a jail where you can do much... rather many things expect
/dev/null
etc.
It is possible to just disable the devfs mount completely for a jail
if
you want the jail to start up anyway without devfs so I think it
would
be OK to simply skip the jail if we cannot mount devfs - and
complain
loudly.
Anybody have any cases where this would be a problem?
Just curious. Why devfs mounts can fail ?
If $JAIL/dev doesn't exist or if one has messed up the devfs rulset
configuration are two reasons I can think of.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
