On 02/10/2012 03:03, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> Hmm, so statd sometimes does not feel like starting the first time, but
> is willing the second time? That would be a bug that should not be
> worked around with that extra check.
It seems to be related to the first random port that statd chooses being
in use, and statd not being very smart about recovering from that. (And
yes, I know about the -p option .... not really the point.) I'd like to
be able to thoroughly test that all required services are running when
the next thing on the list is starting.
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
