On 8/26/13 7:56 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Hiroki Sato <[email protected]> wrote:
Xin Li <[email protected]> wrote
in <[email protected]>:
de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
de> Hash: SHA512
de>
de> Hi,
de>
de> I've noticed that we do not install default route last (after other
de> static routes). I think we should probably install it last, since the
de> administrator may legitimately configure a static route (e.g. this
de> IPv6 address goes to this interface) that is required by the default
de> route.
Do you have an example? I could imagine some theoretically but
personally think that the default route which depends on a static
route is one which should be avoided.
-- Hiroki
Isn't that the case when the default gateway address is on a different
subnet than the address assigned to the interface? Such set ups are
admittedly odd but they should be possible on FreeBSD as well as on
other OSes.
That has always been specifically not supported. default route needs
to be directly attached.
in fact the routing tables only ever deliver the 'next hop'
-Kimmo
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
