On Dec 26, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Alexander Logvinov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems this a typo:
>
> --- bsd.ruby.mk 22 Nov 2010 05:47:07 -0000 1.203
> +++ bsd.ruby.mk 26 Dec 2010 16:32:33 -0000
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@
> .if ${RUBY_VER} == 1.8
> RAKE_BIN= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake
> .else
> -RAKE_BIN= ${GEM_LIB_DIR}/bin/rake${RUBY_VER:S/.//}
> +RAKE_BIN= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake${RUBY_VER:S/.//}
> .endif
> .endif
>
> Also it can be:
>
> --- bsd.ruby.mk 22 Nov 2010 05:47:07 -0000 1.203
> +++ bsd.ruby.mk 26 Dec 2010 16:34:47 -0000
> @@ -547,11 +547,11 @@
> .endif
>
> .if defined(USE_RAKE)
> -BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake:${PORTSDIR}/devel/rubygem-rake
> .if ${RUBY_VER} == 1.8
> RAKE_BIN= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake
> +BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${RAKE_BIN}:${PORTSDIR}/devel/rubygem-rake
> .else
> -RAKE_BIN= ${GEM_LIB_DIR}/bin/rake${RUBY_VER:S/.//}
> +RAKE_BIN= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake${RUBY_VER:S/.//}
> .endif
> .endif
>
This change was made because we had problems with old version of rake
bundled with ruby 1.9. That's why we made it to always install rake, even
for 1.9. Or was it rubygem?
Why this is a promlem in any case? It seems that this path should point
to the right rake location for 1.9.
--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
