On 27 August 2011 15:59, Conrad J. Sabatier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:42:09 +0100 > Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 27 August 2011 15:37, Conrad J. Sabatier <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:22:56 +0300 >> > Andriy Gapon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> I'd think that it would be sufficient to fix the reason why the >> >> BROKEN line was added in the first place. >> >> >> > >> > Perhaps not. At Chris Rees' suggestion, I deinstalled ruby18 and >> > tried building amarok again. No dice. >> > >> > It seems that the paths to the ruby includes amarok's configure >> > script is looking for differ in ruby19. Grrrr! >> > >> >> At the risk of stating the obvious, have you tried playing with the >> -I flags? > > Uh...not yet. I was so taken aback at how differently the two ruby > ports handle the installation of their includes that I got > sidetracked. :-) > > I'm still trying to figure out how any includes get installed at all by > ruby18 (or at least, how they get registered). Nothing in the > Makefile or the pkg-plist that I can see. Am I missing something? >
You're definitely talking to the wrong guy I'm afraid, but hopefully someone at ruby@ may help... Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
