https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196326
--- Comment #8 from John Marino <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #7) "As they are all built using USES=gem, I'll let you wonder who is in charge of the build thing." Why be coy? I asked a serious question and I would have like the respect of a serious answer. Mk/Uses/gem.mk is listed as "portmgr" for maintainer. I know for a fact that portmgr as a unit doesn't think rubygem framework is behaving correctly. "Technically, there can be no timeout, ever, on issues regarding the framework." This is actually a major issue and potential source of abuse that I hope is rectified in the future. Nobody should have the ability to block good work for "reasons". This bug report is coming up on 2 years of age. I would like to discuss the potential fixes of this but the person in charge should be revealed. If not, I will (begrudgingly) offer a solid fix for this 2 year old PR and I would like it not to be blocked without a good reason. Aren't I doing everything correctly so far? If not, what should I be doing instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
