On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:09:41PM +0000, Jason Slagle wrote: > I have no issue giving up my maintainership if someone with commit wants > it, but would also be interested in helping if a puppet@ was formed - I > took maintainership to try to get some traction but pretty quickly hit some > upstream roadblocks that weren't easily solved in a way that the ports tree > would allow.
Cool. I also contacted portmgr@ regarding setting-up a 'puppet-ports' repository on GitHub for the puppet@ team. The idea would of course that you would be part of that team and have access to this repository, even if you cannot commit into the FreeBSD ports tree. > I can follow up with some Puppet folk - some of my upstream things are > merged - others are still open. Some were blockers for cfacter on FreeBSD. Had you an opportunity to check the updated facter in my proposal? I am running this on my boxes as a replacement of rubygem-facter and it seems to be fine. > I plan to hack on FreeBSD Puppet stuff all day at the contributor summit at > Puppetconf this year if there are others. Unfortunately, I can't attend such events because of the costs (quite expensive and I would have to pay for it personally, no $PAYJOB sponsoring possible) :-( Please note that I am based in France, and EuroBSDCon this year is in Paris, so I guess attending it would be acceptable for me. If we are a bunch of Puppet users there, maybe we can organize something! Regards, Romain -- Romain Tartière <[email protected]> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~romain/ pgp: 8234 9A78 E7C0 B807 0B59 80FF BA4D 1D95 5112 336F (ID: 0x5112336F) (plain text =non-HTML= PGP/GPG encrypted/signed e-mail much appreciated)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
