On Wednesday, 11 October 2006 at 18:08:02 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Jeremie Le Hen schrieb:, > > > Though I admit RELENG_4 is getting dusty, it is not rusty. I believe it > > is still used in many places because of its stability and performance. > > agreed. > > > Is it envisageable to extend the RELENG_4's and RELENG_4_11's EoL once > > more ? > > I second this. > > I know a half dozend installation, that must rum RELENG_4_11, > because FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x simply don't boot on that servers any more. > There is alot of hardware where an updated don't run on. > > kind regards Dirk >
I don't want to bother somebody, but it would be realy cool if we can use RELENG_4 with security updates support for the next year. FreeBSD-4.11 is the best choice for old hardware like our PentiumII 400Mhz router. It's just works. Thats all. In any case thanks for all security officers for they work. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
