On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 12:09 -0400, Josh Mason wrote: > So when all else fails claim that we should expect nothing more from > volunteers. Message received and understood. > > We all know how the rest of the opensource operating system community > has legions of paid developers. Poor FreeBSD.
Are you ignoring the large number of full time developers employed by redhat and their ilk? This means they are a company delivering a product, supported by full time developers, who are paid out of support contracts. This is why redhat is described as a 'vendor'; they sell you stuff. FreeBSD is a volunteer project. This means that there is no-one at all who is paid by FreeBSD to write code for FreeBSD. If this doesn't fit your needs, perhaps you need to re-evaluate your choices. My 2 cents.. Tom Evans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
