On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 01:18:27AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > +1 for LDAP > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:25:16PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote: > > On Sep 16, 2011 10:21 AM, "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some of > > > them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't. I > > > believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these into > > > base. My question is: which ones? > > > > > > DES > > > -- > > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected] > > > > +1 for LDAP > > > > -Brandon > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
Do not mean to reply to my own post but seems these offer the most IMHO benefit to the project and end-users. security/pam_jail A PAM module dropping users in jails after login security/pam_krb5 A Pluggable Authentication Module for Kerberos5 security/pam_ldap A pam module for authenticating with LDAP security/pam_mkhomedir Create HOME with a PAM module on demand security/pam_p11 A PAM module using crypto tokens for auth authenticate against Unix PAM security/pam_pwdfile A pam module for authenticating with flat passwd files security/pam_require A PAM module for restricting access based on unix group or username security/pam_smb NetBIOS domain logon PAM module security/pam_ssh_agent_auth PAM module which permits authentication via ssh-agent sysutils/pam_mount A PAM that can mount volumes for a user session _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
