Hi, On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Mike Tancsa <[email protected]> wrote: > Are there any security reasons as to why > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=142258 ([patch] rtld(1): add > ability to log or print rtld errors) > > would not have been committed to the tree ?
I've added kib@ to Cc list. It doesn't seem to me that this proposed change would do something with security? Personally I think the change is reasonable (but we may want printf be replaced with _rtld_error in rtld.c and use LD_UTRACE there?) Cheers, -- Xin LI <[email protected]> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
