On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 10:49:31AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> [email protected] writes:
> >   * Encrypted the whole (except /boot) system with geli(8)
> >     (HMAC/SHA256 and AES-XTS). It is not as nice and much slower
> >     than proper filesystem-level checksumming but it is what
> >     FreeBSD provides (ZFS is too unstable).
> 
> ZFS is stable enough, but I'm a little confused: encryption is not
> "checksumming", and ZFS provides checksums but not encryption.

Also, on-disk encryption provides no additional protection against
system users. It protects the data when no keys are available (for
example when your turned off laptop is stolen) and in running system
keys are in memory and disks are decrypted, so users that are logged in
have access to decrypted content. To protect file system content from
system users one should use standard UNIX permissions and ACLs.

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheelsystems.com
FreeBSD committer                         http://www.FreeBSD.org
Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!                     http://tupytaj.pl

Attachment: pgpWfIDKqEsXh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to