On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:23:02AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 6/14/12, Greg Lewis <gle...@eyesbeyond.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:26:33PM +0000, FreeBSD Security Advisories > > wrote: > >> IV. Workaround > >> > >> No workaround is available. > >> > >> However FreeBSD/amd64 running on AMD CPUs is not vulnerable to this > >> particular problem. > >> > >> Systems with 64 bit capable CPUs, but running the 32 bit FreeBSD/i386 > >> kernel are not vulnerable, nor are systems running on different > >> processor architectures. > > > > I found these last two paragraphs a little confusing. Is the correct > > interpretation that FreeBSD/amd64 running on Intel CPUs is the vulnerable > > combination? > > http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/byvendor?searchview&Query=FIELD+Reference=649219&SearchOrder=4
Thanks :). That was much clearer. -- Greg Lewis Email : gle...@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : gle...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
