On 3. Jul 2012, at 12:39 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> writes: >> The correct solution to this problem is to remove BIND from the base >> altogether, but I have no energy for all the whinging that would happen >> if I tried (again) to do that. > > I don't think there will be as much whinging as you expect. Times have > changed. > > I'm willing to import and maintain unbound (BSD-licensed validating, > recursive, and caching DNS resolver) if you remove BIND.
I'd object to it. Trading one for another without gaining anything does not help us much. Don't get me wrong I have both running for years and even maintain patches for unbound for 2 years now for functionality they do not provide, which named happily gives me. If you want to do this, I would prefer a properly laid out action plan as the import is by far the easiest but the integration into various parts of the system is harder. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do! _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
