On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 07:30:52PM +0100, Jonathan Anderson wrote: > > If all the times are more or less equally probable in this range […] > > They're very unlikely to be equally probable. It would make sense to do some > characterization of these times and their statistics: a highly non-uniform > distribution would mean that we don't actually get many bits per attach.
I have times for ~2000 device_attach() calls when loading sound card
driver on totally idle system. If someone could take those and analyse
the distribution that would be great.
> > […] we have more
> > than 19 bits of entropy from this one call, but I reduced if to four
> > bits only, because there are devices that are much faster to attach.
> >
>
> Another reason for doing the above characterization is that, if a particular
> device_attach() really does provide 12 bits of uncertainty, it's a shame to
> drop eight of them on the floor.
Rights. That's why I've prepared another patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/harvest_device_attach.2.patch
which effectively discards top ten bits, which means we expect 0.1% of
the attach time to be unpredictable (the attach time in most cases vary
by few percent, not sure yet how much of this variation is really
unpredictable).
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com
FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org
Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://tupytaj.pl
pgpLO3w9SnLk2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
