Thanks Brett, That item just made it to the top of the argument list I'm formulating right now from everyone's input. =) That makes a very strong argument for the OS as "approved".
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Brett Glass <[email protected]> wrote: > One other point of possible interest which points out how silly > this whole thing is. > > While the NIAP Web site does not list FreeBSD as a "compliant" > operating system product, it lists Juniper routers, which run an > embedded version of FreeBSD, as compliant. See > > https://www.niap-ccevs.org/**CCEVS_Products/pcl.cfm?tech_**name=Router<https://www.niap-ccevs.org/CCEVS_Products/pcl.cfm?tech_name=Router> > > There may be other products which have "FreeBSD inside" on their > list as well. > > --Brett Glass > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
