On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 15:47:29 -0700, Xin Li wrote: > What would be the preferable way of representing the patchlevel? We > can do it as part of a EN batch at later time. (Note though, even > without this the user or an application can still use > freebsd-version(1) on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE and up to find out the > patchlevel for userland).
On an updated system: [(18:56:41) apeiron@behemoth ~] freebsd-version 10.0-STABLE [(18:56:42) apeiron@behemoth ~] freebsd-version -k 10.0-STABLE [(18:56:43) apeiron@behemoth ~] freebsd-version -u 10.0-STABLE [(18:56:47) apeiron@behemoth ~] I can't say this is very useful. Is this only supposed to work for -RELEASE? -- Chris Nehren
pgp8HDAvo8ETQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
