-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 04/28/14 11:11, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 4/28/14, 6:30 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> Leif Pedersen <[email protected]> writes: >>> I realized that we don't really need any extravagance from ld >>> at all. Move the files for the base version of openssl to a >>> different location, and replace them with symlinks. >> ...and break your system. >> >> OpenSSL 0.9.x and 1.0.x are *not* binary compatible. > > are they somewhat "API" compatible? can you compile most code > against either?
Yes you can. They are just not so guaranteed to be ABI compatible. Cheers, - -- Xin LI <[email protected]> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTXp0sAAoJEJW2GBstM+ns3RMP/RTh8PJ39cHTzYAWB5svSTVP Z+pxt9/C3422RAkgXhOTbC0GSF/AP/sm+kNDiUZpV3JmJ6s6kPYW9HlbRvZf38c3 ltwZbOzOFwY3iZ6+0PsKq99HhSjDuwHCa6E7QWcM2Y+Q4edR+55q+gew4gI7P9S6 r93BO4YYlTXv/Jg1goRT8MlGGDvKH5wdLQn3PfFV4xdLy1yw5I8LzDxNYZdDu547 /P0jfsOa1mGdCiDdKcVpZnCwINNHbrZqfo5P2YfO9eAMdnOQ8pDEx4S79yaOEqze UR74izdHvPYsTiemKKOaN6t/Yp4+NZnfRNJfPbftltjH3+gdlcQb+qb5eBPmCXYY /nRHss5H3Vm3Ta+bjbKWln0DsFfkK6Ej/s33QqJagMF34OizOP1UQsxdgcdg0I/e YFsKWT31JHOpsiNPTwmWbYJWHsSR5vZgXoUJv3PR23IV5m8xNKIib/iooY+aTOJ3 G7SbE0JwXhE5lE2jgE1q4CsCWVBzz3I+aDn/s61pVB2tttHmdjFVU5Fy2Lr3lD+F W8p3oNjQLBJB1t+Kwi0TgYAZ26yt0HUtyfKh6M4oM8jyV1v/IAiugYXD9AU9wD9b wu1wa9hc/H0VWX4v6d5BfNZIr2QdTtPOuqvFN/KzAouhMQkfyiE97wh3NTT1fR2l eOQ5saNXkLnE6PAik+l5 =T+vN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
