On 16 Sep 2014, at 18:42, Zoran Kolic <[email protected]> wrote: >> The advisory solution offers 3 options... freebsd-update is the binary >> approach (option #3) that provides you a new updated generic kernel >> already compiled. If you aren't using a generic kernel or want to patch >> and recompile your own, then you would use the option #2. > > Hm! I use custom kernel. Here is what I did using > freebsd-update: > I fetched and installed. Then I recompiled the kernel. > Did I miss the security patch doing this?
If you have a custom kernel, you should update your local sources and rebuild world and the kernel. You should not use freebsd-update which is not the right tool for customized kernels and environments (because you deviate from the standard, which you likely have a good reason for). So, option 2) should apply to you after updating your local checked out sources.. Please let me know if I can be of more help wrt. this issue (no need to send this to the entire list :)) Cheers Remko > > Zoran > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" -- /"\ Best regards, | [email protected] \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
