On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > (Bcc'ed some unnamed patch authors so they can correct me if I was wrong > ). > > On 07/23/15 13:48, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:57PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 > >> > >> On 07/22/15 06:18, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:57:46AM +0000, FreeBSD Security > >>> Advisories wrote: > >>> > >>> This is correspondent to kern/25986? Or kern/25986 is > >>> different bug? > >> > >> I think it's the same bug. > > > > I see patch in kern/25986 is different from SA. May be SA close not > > all issuses? > > Yes they are different, but I think that one and r284941 (MFC'ed to > stable/10 as r285793) should have addressed all possible situations.
: When TCP socket goes to LAST_ACK state & remote host do not respone : ACK forever, socket would stay at LAST_ACK forever and never be : removed. This situation too? Regardless of zero window condition? _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"