On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> (Bcc'ed some unnamed patch authors so they can correct me if I was wrong
> ).
> 
> On 07/23/15 13:48, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:57PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> > 
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
> >> 
> >> On 07/22/15 06:18, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:57:46AM +0000, FreeBSD Security 
> >>> Advisories wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> This is correspondent to kern/25986? Or kern/25986 is
> >>> different bug?
> >> 
> >> I think it's the same bug.
> > 
> > I see patch in kern/25986 is different from SA. May be SA close not
> > all issuses?
> 
> Yes they are different, but I think that one and r284941 (MFC'ed to
> stable/10 as r285793) should have addressed all possible situations.

: When TCP socket goes to LAST_ACK state & remote host do not respone
: ACK forever, socket would stay at LAST_ACK forever and never be
: removed.

This situation too? Regardless of zero window condition?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to