-------- In message <[email protected]>, Eric McCorkl e writes: >On 10/28/2017 09:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> -------- >> In message <[email protected]>, Benjamin Kaduk writes: >> >>> I would say that the 1.1.x series is less bad, especially on the last count, >>> but don't know how much you've looked at the differences in the new branch. >> >> While "less bad" is certainly a laudable goal for OpenSSL, I hope >> FreeBSD has higher ambitions. >> > >I'm curious about your thoughts on LibreSSL as a possible option.
It retains the horrible APIs, so the potential improvement is finite. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
