>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:28:43 +0100, Franco Fichtner said: > > > On 11. Dec 2020, at 13:20, Martin Simmons <mar...@lispworks.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > >>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:44:17 +0100, Franco Fichtner said: > >> > >>>> On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons <mar...@lispworks.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said: > >>>> > >>>> What are peoples thoughts on how to address the support mismatch between > >>>> FreeBSD and OpenSSL? And how to address it? > >>> > >>> Maybe it would help a little if the packages on pkg.FreeBSD.org all used > >>> the > >>> pkg version of OpenSSL? Currently, it looks like you have build your own > >>> ports if you want that. > >> > >> This pretty much breaks LibreSSL ports usage for binary package consumers. > > > > I'm talking about the binary packages from pkg.FreeBSD.org. Don't they > > always > > use the base OpenSSL at the moment? > > Yes, and if it would be built against ports OpenSSL you can no longer build > against LibreSSL locally. > > In OPNsense we do build against ports OpenSSL for upgrade ease, but we also > offer a second set of packages for LibreSSL. > > For the normal FreeBSD user defaulting packages against OpenSSL from ports > would be severely limiting their capability to deviate from this with one-off > builds and most cannot or will not run their own poudriere batch.
OK, I see what you mean now. The underlying problem is that it is impossible to install packages/ports for OpenSSL and LibreSSL at the same time. __Martin _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
