On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:16:45AM +0200, Roger Skjetlein wrote:
> I'm a bit conserned since the 5.x didn't exactly prove good stabillity 
> and performance records, thats why I ask wether 6.0 is better than 5.x.

6.0 and 5.0 really aren't comparable in any way.  You should think of
it as "5.4 + new stuff", instead of "4.x completely redesigned" (which
5.0 was).

If you're concerned about stability though, the best you can do is try
it out on a non-critical system and see how it works for you.

Kris

Attachment: pgpTY25aKGTG6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to