Andrew Snow wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > On the other hand, 8-current seems to run quite stable at > > the moment; I have it running on a workstation for several > > weeks without problems. > > What date of CURRENT are you running? I tracked down crashes related to > changes in SMBFS, but I am still experiencing almost weekly crashes such > as machine running out of swap space in the middle of the night for no > apparent reason..
$ uname -rs FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT-20081128 $ uptime 12:23PM up 25 days, 22:07, 0 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 I'm not using SMBFS, though. It's a workstation running typical desktop things (xterms, web browser, gimp, sane and similar). Best regards Oliver PS: Just in case someone wonders how to get timestamp suffixes to the kernel version string: I'm using this little script in place of "make kernel": http://www.secnetix.de/olli/scripts/makekernel -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "[...] one observation we can make here is that Python makes an excellent pseudocoding language, with the wonderful attribute that it can actually be executed." -- Bruce Eckel _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
