>> I am also surprised that this isn't more widely reported, as >> the hardware is very common. The only oddity with ym compile >> is that I set the CPUTYPE to 'core2' - that shouldnt have an effect, but >> I will remove it anyway, just so I am actually building a completely >> vanilla amd64. That way I should have what everyone else has, and since >> I don't see anyone else saying they have isues then maybe mine will >> go away too (fingers crossed) >> > Intel suggests nocona for x86_64 platforms and prescott for x86 > (i386) based platforms on the 4.2 line, because they best matched the > cache size and featureset of the Core2 processors. > > I don't think that core2 support was fully completed in 4.2 (in > fact I believe it was just started), and I don't think that our > binutils supports it properly. > > Some thoughts, > -Garrett
I've updagraded a test-webserver to 7.1 when it was released. After a few days I upgraded a production-webserver to 7.1 on Jan. 8'th and it has been running without any problems. The webserver is not heavily loaded (load at 2-3 on average). I have made a buildworld -j 8 and it runs fine. If the reported lockup is due to i/o a buildworld will not be able to reproduce it. It has performed a buildworld without problems and I'll be doing some buildworlds throughout the day. This is on a HP c-class-blade with 8 GB ram, 2 x quad-core and the build-in p200-controller with 64 MB ram. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
