On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Robert Watson wrote: RW> > am I right concluding that under FreeBSD jail there is no way to attach RW> > two processes to the same port of external interface address and RW> > localhost? RW> > RW> > I tried to move rather standard two-tier nginx(ip:80)+apache(127.1:80) RW> > scheme into a jail and on apache start got RW> > RW> > [Thu Jan 29 00:09:32 2009] [crit] (48)Address already in use: make_sock: RW> > could not bind to address 127.0.0.1 port 80 RW> > RW> > (this is under RELENG_7 if it's relevant) RW> > RW> > Any thoughts? Thanks in advance. RW> RW> The way Jail is implemented is that the jail IP is silently substituted for RW> the loopback IP is used. This has some downsides, and this is one of them. RW> The virtual network stack (VIMAGE) project for FreeBSD 8.0 is intended to RW> address this, among many other things, by providing full virtualization of RW> all network stack data structures for jails.
Thank you for clarification, now I see this is actually expected behaviour :) Would then starting second jail with the same root and, say, 127.10.0.1 as an address be a workaround? -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: [email protected] ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [email protected] *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
