2009/11/21 Peter Jeremy <[email protected]>: > On 2009-Nov-21 09:47:56 +0900, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: >>imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you do >>not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and burn >>some eye of newt. > > FWIW, it's still very brittle on Solaris 10 and the Sun Support > response to most issues is "restore from backup". The IMHO, the > biggest issue with ZFS itself is lack of recovery tools prior to PSARC > 2009/479 (in ZFS v21). > > On 2009-Nov-21 11:36:43 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick <[email protected]> > wrote: >>RELENG_7 uses ZFS v13, RELENG_8 uses ZFS v18. > > Not in my repository. I still have v13 in > sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/sys/fs/zfs.h in last night's > RELENG_7, RELENG_8 and -current.
The good side of things is that there's the ongoing work on v13 -> v22 in perforce. > >>RELENG_7 and RELENG_8 both, more or less, behave the same way with >>regards to ZFS. Both panic on kmem exhaustion. No one has answered my >>question as far as what's needed to stabilise ZFS on either 7.x or 8.x. > > My understanding is that the problem is more that the FreeBSD VM > system doesn't gracefully handle running low or out of memory. AFAIU kmacy works on zfs integration into FreeBSD'ish buf/vm. It'd be nice to read something on that.. -- wbr, pluknet _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
