On 09/03/2010 11:27, Ian Smith wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > > ntpd tracks interface updates, however it does not requery > > servers, when they occur. This was less than an hour ago, > > at my university, the notebook boots and is not connected > > to anything: > > > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: logging to file /var/log/ntpd > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: precision = 2.234 usec > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: Listening on interface #0 wildcard, > 0.0.0.0#123 Disabled > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: Listening on interface #1 wildcard, ::#123 > Disabled > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: Listening on interface #2 bge0, > 192.168.1.12#123 Enabled > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: Listening on interface #3 lo0, fe80::1#123 > Enabled > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: Listening on interface #4 lo0, ::1#123 Enabled > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: Listening on interface #5 lo0, 127.0.0.1#123 > Enabled > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: Listening on routing socket on fd #26 for > interface updates > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: kernel time sync status 2040 > > 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: frequency initialized 3.155 PPM from > /var/db/ntpd.drift > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: host name not found: 0.de.pool.ntp.org > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: couldn't resolve `0.de.pool.ntp.org', giving > up on it > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: host name not found: 1.de.pool.ntp.org > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: couldn't resolve `1.de.pool.ntp.org', giving > up on it > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: host name not found: 2.de.pool.ntp.org > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: couldn't resolve `2.de.pool.ntp.org', giving > up on it > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: host name not found: ntp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: couldn't resolve `ntp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de', > giving up on it > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: host name not found: ntp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: couldn't resolve `ntp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de', > giving up on it > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: host name not found: ntp3.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: couldn't resolve `ntp3.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de', > giving up on it > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: host name not found: ntp4.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de > > 9 Mar 08:07:20 ntpd[1542]: couldn't resolve `ntp4.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de', > giving up on it > > > > So ntpd has given up on all the servers listed in the ntp.conf file. > > Yes, but it looks more like name service that's not operating, ntpd > seems to be doing its best but can't resolve the hostnames?
Why would I have named running on a notebook? This is a notebook, which is not connected to the internet. > > I then proceed to connect to the wireless network and proceed to log > > into two VPNs: > > > > 9 Mar 08:08:58 ntpd[1510]: Listening on interface #6 wlan0, > 192.168.75.58#123 Enabled > > 9 Mar 08:09:00 ntpd[1510]: Listening on interface #7 tun0, > 193.196.120.15#123 Enabled > > 9 Mar 08:09:04 ntpd[1510]: Listening on interface #8 tun1, > 141.3.162.67#123 Enabled > > > > Over interface #8 some of the servers are actually available, but > > ntpq -p still states: > > No association ID's returned > > > > Only when I restart ntpd, it operates as expected: > > remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset > jitter > > > ============================================================================== > > zit-net2.uni-pa .STEP. 16 u - 512 0 0.000 0.000 > 0.000 > > alpha.rueckgr.a .STEP. 16 u - 512 0 0.000 0.000 > 0.000 > > ntp.goneco.de .STEP. 16 u - 512 0 0.000 0.000 > 0.000 > > +proxy4.rz.uni-k 129.13.64.17 2 u 30 128 271 2.937 2.530 > 1.891 > > +proxy2.rz.uni-k 129.13.64.17 2 u 58 128 375 3.593 -8.981 > 1.837 > > *proxy1.rz.uni-k 129.13.64.17 2 u 15 128 271 3.297 8.244 > 1.487 > > I've always had to restart named after losing / regaining an interface, > most noticeably after a suspend/resume (eg a low battery suspend), so I > run /etc/rc.d/named restart from rc.resume. This looks like a similar > issue perhaps, though I don't see why restarting only ntpd would fix it. As I said, named doesn't run at all. When the notebook gets an internet connection, ntpd recognizes this. It somehow doesn't occur to it, though, that it might be able to resolve the servers, now. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
