On Jul 21, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Bakul Shah wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:28:08 PDT Chuck Swiger <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Jul 21, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Bakul Shah wrote: >>> I am in no hurry to upgrade my MBP to OS X Lion but given Lion >>> time machine and netatalk issues, >> >> Which issues? (And did you file a bug report? :-) > > Google `os x lion netatalk time machine'!
With due respect for the search folks up the road in Mountain View, I asked which issues you'd had and whether you'd filed a bug report about them. > But briefly, a newer version of the appletalk protocol is used with lion time > machine which is not supported by netatalk in the ports. Ah, yes: anything below AFP 3.2 or direct block access is likely ENOTSUP. >>> I got wondering if iSCSI on FreeBSD is stable enough for >>> time machine use. How much duct tape and baling wire are needed >>> to make it work?! >> >> There was a fine discussion about this here: >> >> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/ZFS-vs-OSX-Time-Machine-td4346562.html > > Thanks. I think I saw it back then.... Nothing new since then? Aside from Lion, you mean? Well, FreeBSD seems to be making progress with ZFS and memory tuning; I'm not as familiar with work being done on iSCSI. Regards, -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
