On 02/03/2012 05:34, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:17:14 pm George Mitchell wrote:
>> On 02/02/12 15:37, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
>>> [... one of three errors it's been reporting repeatedly for days ...]
>> Talk about a lack of focus! Apparently two or three people have all
>> recently checked in code without first verifying that it compiled (let
>> alone ran), or else possibly did not completely commit their changes,
>> and then absconded to a place where they fail to receive these emails
>> about the problems. Can someone please either diagnose these errors or
>> else revert the deficient commits? -- George Mitchell
>
> No, it is more that the tinderbox for 8 wasn't actually checking these
> kernels before (they have been broken since 8.1 and 8.2 were released) and
> they are on less-used platforms.
Shouldn't whoever asked for that to be enabled take responsibility for
cleaning them up then?
> I do agree it needs to be cleaned up one way
> or another. Given the reticence to commit changes to release branches,
They're already broken. It's hard to see how fixing the problems could
make things worse. :)
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
