On Mon, February 27, 2012 15:33, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Feb 26, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > [ ... ] >> all with zfs and one gig of RAM. > > This isn't a sensible combination; I wouldn't try to run ZFS on anything less > than 4GB...
regardless of the pool size ? I was planning on making an atom board a file server for my home, and I have two options: soekris net6501 2GB RAM and intel board powered by the 330 atom (says 2GB limited as well). My plans are to use from 4 up to 8 disks, and they should be 2TB at least. As its for home use, some p2p software and mostly music listening and sometimes movie streaming. should 2GB be that bad, that I should drop it and use UFS instead ? I may run any version of FreeBSD on it, was planning on 9-STABLE or 9.1. thanks, matheus -- We will call you Cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
