On 02/03/2012 16:45, Mark Linimon wrote: >> Other ports aren't supported on certain target architectures but the build >> > doesn't tell you that until after it has run for a couple of hours
> Those are also bugs. Please send PRs for those, as well. I am particularly
> concerned about amd64 in this regard (although I am actually only myself
> doing the package runs for sparc64 and powerpc). We continually try to
> adjust the metadata for ports to indicate where they will and will not
> run, based on the output of pointyhat runs. (OTOH pointyhat runs the
> src tree from "the oldest supported minor release on each branch", so
> this may be a clue .)
Which reminds me about this: ports/164638
I've kind of taken my eye of progress on that, being distracted by other
things.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
