Hi, On 02 June 2012 PM 2:56:01 Chris Nehren wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 14:11:06 -0400 , Paul Mather wrote: > > I'm not sure what the solution is for the end user. I know I get > > somewhat leery of updating my ports if I see a large number of changes > > coming via portsnap (like the 4000+ that accompanied the recent libpng > > upgrade) and there is nothing new in UPDATING (which, happily wasn't > > the case with the libpng upgrade). Usually, I wait a while for the > > dust to clear and an UPDATING entry potentially to appear. > > If you're concerned about things breaking, don't follow the bleeding > edge. This seems to be common sense.
is there a second version of the ports tree available? What is the response of the list if you want to install a new package with you old ports tree? Erich _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
