On 6/12/12 2:48 PM, Pete French wrote: > Meant to reply to this at the time, but have been away... > >> Has anyone else run into problems when using IPv6 + CARP ? > > I ran into some - aliases on a CARP integface did not seem > to work proprly - but if you workaround that then it appears > to work fine. We are using it in production with no problems. > >> I plan to hold a presentation at work on IP6 and why we should start >> using it, however I cannot promote the use of IP6 without redundancy >> between firewalls like we currently do with CARP + pfsync. > > The redundancy with pfsync works properly - an ssh session > is maintained through the firewalls when they failover. I > configure my machines to use a paiur of carp interfaces on each > physical port, so I am not mixing IPv4 and IPv6 on the same > interface. I onyl did that as an experiment when I was trying > to work around the aliases problem, but have kept it for "tidnyess" > > Basically our experience of the setup has been very positive - our > main connectivity issues have come from the HE/Cogent peering squabble > rather than any FreeBSD/Carp/PF failing. > > cheers, > > -pete.
Thanks for the feedback Pete, what are you running ? We're on 8-STABLE here. I've got some spare time on my hands actually, I'm gonna try some more today, both on an ipv6-only carp, then on a v4+v6. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
