On 12 Sep 2012 07:19, "Christer Solskogen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Mark Linimon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of > > our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang" doesn't > > really help us all that much. > > > > I disagree. Just a tiny bit ;-) > If the PR says that USE_GCC=4.2 works as a workaround, it helps.
We don't want thousands of PRs duplicating the information from a simple list of failures. Any can be fixed in this way. Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
