On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:08 PM, CeDeROM <cede...@tlen.pl> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Kimmo Paasiala <kpaas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It doesn't look like the FreeBSD ports SVN repository is used to its >> full potential. (...) > > Yea, btw why FreeBSD does not use GIT? I have been using it for some > time and I have not seen better source code revision utility. GIT is > really amazing, SVN/CVS seems to be a file revision control, while GIT > is the source code revision control, this tool surprises me all the > time with its great features :-) > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
I would personally use GIT but I'm ok with SVN too. I absolutely hate CVS :P My point is really that why not centralise all the development that happens around the ports tree. The infrastructure is there already. -Kimmo _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
