On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote: > On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have a Tinderbox that I just updated to the current RELENG_9. >> Following the update build times for packages have increased by a >> factor between 5 and 20. I.e. I have packages that used to build in >> 5 minutes and now take an hour. >> >> I'm suspecting the file system ever since I saw that the majority of CPU >> load was caused by ls when I looked at top (more than 2 minutes of CPU >> time were counted that moment). The majority of the time most of the CPU >> load is caused by bsdtar, pkg_add, qmake-qt4, etc. Without exception >> tools that access a lot of files. >> >> The file system on which packages are built is nullfs mounted from >> an async mounted UFS. I turned async off, to no avail. >> >> /usr/src/UPDATING says that there were nullfs optimisations. So I >> think this is where the problem originates. I might hack the tinderbox to >> use 'ln -s' or set it up for NFS to verify this. > > Is your kernel newer than the Jail? The converse causes problems.
I ran makeJail for all jails after updating. I also seem to have similar problems when building in the host-system. The unzip for openjdk-7 has just passed the 11 minutes CPU time mark. On my notebook it takes less than 10 seconds. Tinderbox: FreeBSD AryaStark.norad 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #1: Mon Dec 31 22:28:36 CET 2012 [email protected]:/usr/obj/GENERIC/amd64/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Notebook: FreeBSD mobileKamikaze.norad 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #1: Sun Dec 23 13:08:04 CET 2012 [email protected]:/usr/obj/HP6510b-9/amd64/usr/src/sys/HP6510b-9 amd64 -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
